Thursday, February 23, 2012

Should the Curriculum Address Controversial Issues?

Let me first start by stating the fact that being an educator is a very challenging profession. (Well duh, I know.) As a teacher, you take on many different roles; you are mother, a father, a certified babysitter, a teacher, a counselor etc. It makes sense since, for many students, their teacher is the adult figure that they see more in the day than their own parent or guardian. Six and a half hours are spent everyday teaching them information; some of this information is helpful such as work ethic, how to read effectively, and basic math skills. Teaching to prepare for state standardized tests does not seem effective or beneficial, but for 3-12 teachers in Maryland, right that is what we are doing. We as teachers teach students all of these concepts that they may or may not remember and yet we tend to leave out the more important lessons; life lessons that need to be addressed and emphasized in order to help children become acceptable men and women in society or the real world. It’s funny to me that for as long as we have them, we guard them; we shield our students from addressing the real issues, the issues that they may be faced with now and/ or later.
We teach students, so why is that when a topic comes up that is not in the curriculum and could be considered controversial BUT effective and beneficial for my students to learn, why it is that I have to beat around the bush and not teach them at a time that would be ideal and an authentic teachable moment? Why is it that we shelter these students from real topics? Why do we shelter them from what lies beyond the school walls? These are questions I often think about but even more so while reading and reflecting on this cycle’s focus.
This cycle’s focus looked at whether or not controversial issues should be addressed in the curriculum taught. The issue that we mainly investigated was on the topic of homosexuality. As stated in earlier blogs, I currently am a fifth grade teacher in an inner city school. Many of my students have had to grow up way too fast and because of this, they know more than they should. An example of this happened a few months ago when I was explaining to students that they would be presenting their country projects and this would be a portion of their overall grade. When discussing the project, I said ‘oral presentation’ and two my students burst out laughing. It took several minutes to get these two girls focused again and when I asked them what was so funny, their response was Oh nothing. Students in this generation are exposed to far too much information whether it is from watching television, surfing the internet, hearing their parents, or hearing their peers. Yet so often these students misinterpret the facts and therefore, have a wrong perception about how it is really is. Allowing students to take on these perceptions seems wrong to me on so many levels, but there are certain topics of conversation that I have to stay away from because it’s not my place.
Many of the families and teachers in my school are very religious. It is obvious that bringing up a topic such as homosexuality would be blasphemy. Many of the teachers and parents that are apart of my school feel that homosexuality is not a lifestyle, but a choice. From generation to generation, people are taught from their mothers and fathers and grandparents etc about what they believe is true. There was a time in my life where I felt that homosexuality was a choice and that it was wrong. Growing up in a small town in Michigan would make it easy to take on such an opinion since in my town, everyone was white and everyone was religious and everyone was straight. However, as time went on and as society has became more accepting of homosexuality, all of a sudden there were homosexual people in my hometown. This isn’t to say that there never were homosexual people before, but now they are starting to feel okay coming out and being themselves.
Homosexuality is a lifestyle in my eyes. I am not one to force my beliefs on other people and I am not saying that everyone has to agree with homosexuality, but I will say that people need to at least recognize that it is a different type of lifestyle, not a choice and students need to recognize that understanding as well. As stated in the Eckholm article, the earlier children are given a positive perception of different types of lifestyles, the more willing they will be to accept it. The earlier that we teach our youth that homosexuality is another part of life, the better chance that it would be seen as a norm rather than abnormal.
This past Tuesday there was a new Glee episode. This episode conveniently focused in on bullying, specifically bullying students because of their sexual orientation. Basically, there was a football player who for a long time bullied another student for being openly gay. It ended up coming out that this football player was actually gay and he bullied the other student because he was envious of how okay he was with himself. He was bullied and decided it was best to move to another school; move to a city where no one knew that he was gay so he could continue to be his old jock self. Eventually, news got out of his sexual orientation and very quickly, the terms fag and gay consumed his facebook wall and text messaging box. The bullying got so severe that this man attempted suicide and would have been successful had his father not found him in time. I bring this example up because this emphasizes the point that people reject what they were never taught to be okay or normal and because of this, men and women attempt or successful with taking their lives because so many people can’t seen beyond the realm.
Bullying has become a nation-wide problem as every day men and women, boys and girls can’t take the name-calling, the teasing, the fighting, the facebook messages, the text messages and so they give up. My school is an anti-bully school and we do our part to diminish the bullying problems. Bullying has always been an issue, but as stated earlier, with the several ways to communicate, bullying is becoming more visible.  Bullying is also becoming a more personal issue as students are being teased not just for how they look, but for who they are.  Similarly to the Eckholm article in my hometown, the topic of placing sexual orientation in the anti-bullying bylaws was brought up and after several months, it was decided that it was not necessary, even though several students emphasized the mental abuse he or she received often because they were gay or lesbian. Even with concrete proof, it still wasn’t enough. This is another reason why many areas of the U.S.A are being counterproductive in exemplifying “an equal and accepting society.”  
          The article “Silence on Gays and Lesbians” really got to me on a number of levels. Firstly, I will be completely honest by saying that for a long time, I was under the impression that homosexuality was new, that it hadn’t been around for a long time. I guess growing up Catholic and living in a really small town would make such misconceptions apparent. Reading the article really opened my eyes to the idea that if homosexuality was brought up in social studies content as a mere part of the course (as pure fact) maybe so many of the examples brought up would seem okay.
The article addressed about the mistreatment of women in Afghanistan and how appalled people are of the beatings, but how men who are homosexual are mistreated as well, probably fair worse, but no one talks about this. For so long race and women were oppressed for equal rights in the United States. For a long time, these issues were not addressed in schools and were considered controversial. Enough people fought and fought to be treated fairly, despite race or gender. It seems that because sexual orientation is not a physical trait, but rather an emotional trait, people can’t accept its truth. Perhaps with time, people will be willing to do the same for sexual orientation. I know I know, easier said then done.
Just because students are not independent, does not mean that they are unable to take on opinions and beliefs of their own. As Eisner emphasized in his piece, “Yet if one mission of the school is to foster wisdom, weaken prejudice, and develop the ability to use a wide range of modes of thought, then it seems to me we ought to examine school programs to locate those areas of thought and those perspectives that are now absent in order to reassure ourselves that these omissions were not a result of ignorance but a product of choice” (pg. 83) We as a society need to stop bestowing our biased opinions on our youth and allow them an opportunity to make their own opinions and their own beliefs because without this thinking, we will continue to go in circles, rather than move forward and prosper.
From this week’s focus, it has opened my eyes to the possibilities that I have with my students, but because of politics and religion, we are limited with how much we say and how we articulate it. As stated in the Eisner article, “Sc Furthermore, it is important to realize that what schools teach is not simply a function of covert intentions; it is largely unintentional. What schools teach they teach in the fashion that the culture itself teaches, because schools are the kinds of places they are” (page 78).Television shows such as Glee and Real World have played a role in making homosexuality not about people with AIDS, but rather people who live the same life as us, just a little differently. My hope is that with time and continuous awareness, such topics such as sexual orientation will not be an issue, but rather an embedded part to the curriculum.


Stop Bullying This website looks at the awareness of bullying, different types of bullying. and ways to prevent and stop bullying in the United States. There are a lot of great resources that could be resourceful in the classroom.

Multicultural Education This website focuses on multicultural education and different resources used to make aware and implement a diverse mentality of learning and growing.

Okay to Be Gay This blog investigates the misconceptions of homosexuality and brings to light a positive, more realistic perception of people who are homosexuals and how it is okay to be gay.

4 comments:

  1. Hi Sarah, I really enjoyed reading your post this week. You not only brought up many great points, but your style of writing was very easy to follow and well done. You had mentioned that in Maryland you are currently preparing for state testing, just as we are in Michigan. Knowing the importance placed on these tests throughout the nation, I can imagine it is difficult to focus valuable instructional time on teaching things other than curricular topics. Whenever I read articles and reports on the value of teaching ideas other than what state testing will require a student to know I always wonder, how and when? I am sure that teachers teaching core classes understand the dilemma far better than I (elective teacher), and I truly feel for those teachers who have to decide between teaching what they know will be the greatest benefit to their students and teaching what they can only guess will be on a state test.
    You ask why we as teachers feel it is necessary to shelter our students from real topics. I would say because we are not their parents. Personally, as a parent, I would not like for a teacher to choose what controversial issues are acceptable for my child to learn about. While you and I (all teachers) know that many parents do not take the time to speak to their children about controversial issues and how to properly form educated opinions on issues, I refuse to believe that students need to learn about certain things in school. I do believe that the school has a role to play in helping students understand controversial topics and forming opinions, but not actually teaching certain topics. However, I do think it makes a difference as to what grade levels we are talking about. Seniors may need to be prepared for such information as they prepare to transition to the next stage of life.
    Bullying certainly is a hot topic across the country. I am somewhat divided on bullying. I will use a couple of cases from the news in recent years. Most recently, I believe in California, one student filed a restraining order against another student. The bully in this story was threatening the other boy’s life. He actually brought a knife to school, showed it to the other student during class, and stated that he was going to kill him after school. These boys were fourth graders I believe. The school suspended the boy for a day. The bullied boy’s parents did not think the school did enough and decided to go to the police. They were able to get a restraining order against the boy. This is a genuine case of bullying in my mind. Where someone’s physical well-being or life are being threatened. However, about a year ago a girl in Boston committed suicide because of what was being written about her on Facebook. I am not completely familiar with Facebook, but the way I understand it is that someone cannot write on your wall unless they are friends with you. Why did this girl not cancel friendships with girls writing nasty things? A lot of the bullying we spend time discussing in schools is really the same things every person goes through. While I am in no way condoning name calling and harassment on the levels that we are seeing I do believe we need to teach and instill confidence in young people so they are more resistant to abuses. Many young people are so desperate for attention and confidence that they are making poor decisions that lead other young people to attack them for their poor decisions.

    END PART 1

    ReplyDelete
  2. Part 2

    You used a quote from Eckholm that stated, “the earlier children are given a positive perception of different types of lifestyles, the more willing they will be to accept it.” I think this can be very dangerous. If we consider the number of students we teach that come from conservative homes we could put ourselves in hot water teaching acceptance of issues such as homosexuality. Acceptance for many people can mean getting rid of your family’s beliefs and accepting society’s views on an issue. I think what is most important is to teach students to treat each other as humans regardless of their lifestyle. Ultimately, everyone cannot have the same opinions and lifestyle choices, but we can be civil to one another. Your Eisner quote states to weaken prejudice. This is the key, that students do not act terrible to one another because of differences in lifestyles.
    I hope this does not come across as a negative response to your post. Your post was very good I just wanted to play devil’s advocate and look at your points from another perspective. Ultimately, I think all teachers want to teach students the ideals of civic responsibility and help them become successful in all areas of life including teaching them to be willing to act in a civil manner to all people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ciaran,
    I am not offended at all by your response and if anything, I am eager to enlighten, clarify, and reiterate some of the arguments that I made in my post. Let me first start by stressing that my goal of addressing controversial issues is not to persuade or force any of my students to take on my perspectives. Eisner's arguments were to address these issues in an objective manner and to allow the students to come up with their own opinions about the matter. Growing up, my parents readily would teach my siblings and I civic responsibility, common courtesy, and work ethic. While we were religious, my parents never threw their religious or political beliefs on us because they wanted us children to come up with our own opinions. It is so difficult not to persuade our adult opinions and perspectives to our students and children, but that is very much the problem that our society faces. If able to teach homosexuality in the classroom, I merely would address it as another type of lifestyle. Being that this topic is controversial, a letter would be sent home prior to the lessons, so parents would be aware and could pull their child out if they do not want their them to participate. An example of this teaching would be me teaching republican vs. democrat. I would teach what beliefs and opinions differ the two political stances and would teach it in a way that would be unbiased and objective. Obviously parents want what's best for their child(ren), but I guess the question ends up being, "Do I want my child to treat everyone with respect even despite, race, gender, and sexual orientation?" We still have people who are bigots and Neo-Nazis because parents have taught their children to think and act in a very narrow-minded manner. Is that just?

    Responding to your stance on bullying, the story you had mentioned about the girl committing suicide because of comments sent on Facebook would be an example of cyber bullying. Cyber bullying is a very serious form of bullying that has become a more preferable way to bully since the invention of social networking groups. Even if the girl was not friends with the other girls, the girls could still write comments about her (but the girl would have no way of knowing). Last year, bullying was going on in my 5th grade class and it had gotten to the point where students were posting really nasty comments about some of the girls and as opposed to verbally saying it, the comments were posted so EVERYONE connected to the girl's Facebook page could see. While the comments could be erased, several people would have seen the comment or comments prior to deleting the post. Any form of bullying is terrible and bullying has been a problem for a long time; however, now it is more widely known and not tolerate because of social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter etc. While many anti-bullying groups and awareness has been made, bullying will still be an issue with people not willing to accept people for their differences.

    I thank you for your opinions and for allowing me to dive a little bit more into my philosophies as both a teacher and a member of a struggling society.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sarah,

    Thank you so much for your post--its depth and passion were clear!

    You said a lot of wise things, but in some ways, this goes to the heart of the matter for me:

    "It’s funny to me that for as long as we have them, we guard them; we shield our students from addressing the real issues, the issues that they may be faced with now and/ or later."

    The way you put this, it really should make us ask hard questions. What's really driving this head-in-the-sand approach? Are we so afraid of controversy or are we afraid of something in ourselves?

    Put this way, it makes teaching-to-the-test look like a giant strategy adults have created to get themselves off the hook from having to talk and intervene in very real and very messy childhood problems.

    Personally, I would agree with you that any type of bullying is an issue. Of course that doesn't mean we have to get all sanctimonious about it (I think we would also agree about that). Figuring out why kids bully is a first step (they too are obviously hurting, and as teachers, we need to help all kids). And then talking about is a second step. Whenever I think about this issue, I come back to Vivian Paley--who is just so amazing at orchestrating these really difficult conversations with young kids.

    As Jonathan Silin argues (http://www.scribd.com/doc/82990788/Silin-HIV-AIDS-Education), we like to put things in boxes. In school, those are usually content boxes. We can restrict this to a period called "sex ed" or "social studies" and then go ahead and ignore all of the real-life struggles are students are undergoing. But an issue like AIDS (in the Silin article), or bullying, can't be contained in subjects or even in special programs. Adults need to be willing to listen to kids and help them sort out their problems.

    But right now, we are all too busy teaching to the test . . .

    So, I hope you will keep looking for those openings. It's always probably been about those teachers keen on finding the teachable moments, and demanding dignity for all along on the way.

    Thanks for your post!!

    Kyle

    ReplyDelete